tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7707150939656431115.post8762821331090920330..comments2023-10-29T10:35:18.995-04:00Comments on 3E-COE: It's not only about water.3E-COE: Environment, Ecology, and Educationhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16370501369699223112noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7707150939656431115.post-70519099654856492932009-10-19T04:08:52.668-04:002009-10-19T04:08:52.668-04:00Haha, the expression "soda-fear mongers"...Haha, the expression "soda-fear mongers" is my new favorite!Alex Dhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01774887161821341931noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7707150939656431115.post-28244845432860030152009-10-15T19:26:38.218-04:002009-10-15T19:26:38.218-04:00There is no such evidence. From what I understand ...There is no such evidence. From what I understand the people at Washington U. in St. Louis saw soda sales decline.Peter Bucklandhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06660306787777777265noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7707150939656431115.post-67096728718339589272009-10-15T14:45:38.599-04:002009-10-15T14:45:38.599-04:00"Shift to soda"?! Isn't this sellin..."Shift to soda"?! Isn't this selling people short a wee bit? I understand the public health implications of drinking soda. I also understand that soda is a convenient beverage of choice for many people. <br /><br />But if we seriously consider that people would simply shift to drinking soda just because they couldn't drink bottled water, it is like admitting that our cause is lost from the get go. <br /><br />Why not assume that people would switch to other, and better, ways of drinking water? Is there any evidence to suggest that the absence of bottled water results in higher amounts of soda consumption?<br /><br />Soda-fear mongers sound like nay-sayers in disguise.Zachary Bullockhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05177171432744244005noreply@blogger.com